SEC Sues Miami Resident for Conducting Multi-Million Dollar Ponzi Scheme

Washington, D.C., Oct. 30, 2008 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Miami resident Andres L. Pimstein and two private companies, The Bottom Line of South Florida, Inc. and Summit Trading LLC, with securities fraud for conducting a $30 million Ponzi scheme.


Additional Materials


The SEC’s complaint alleges that from at least 2005 to April 2008, Pimstein and his agents offered and sold more than $30 million in securities to at least 80 investors in at least five states, purportedly to fund an export business that Pimstein operated through Bottom Line and Summit. The Ponzi scheme collapsed when the interest and principal Bottom Line and Summit were obligated to pay investors substantially exceeded the amount of new funds Pimstein and his agents were able to raise from investors.

“The alleged conduct in this case shows a pattern of outright lies to investors. We remain committed to taking vigorous enforcement action against those who violate the securities laws through fraudulent securities offerings,” said David Nelson, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office.

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court for the Southern District of Florida, Pimstein and his agents told investors that Bottom Line and Summit would use the proceeds from their investments to buy iPods and other personal electronics from vendors in the United States for resale to Ripley Corp., S.A., a Chilean company that operates one of the largest department store chains in South America. The complaint further alleges that Pimstein and his agents claimed Bottom Line and Summit had a competitive edge over other electronics suppliers because Pimstein was the cousin of Ripley’s chief executive officer and had previously worked for Ripley.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that, contrary to these representations, very few electronics were purchased with investor funds and no electronics were re-sold to Ripley. Instead, Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit operated a large Ponzi scheme by using newly invested funds to make principal and interest payments to existing investors. Pimstein and the companies also paid commissions to the agents who solicited investors on the defendants’ behalf. In addition, Pimstein used investor funds to pay his personal expenses.

According to the SEC’s complaint, after the scheme collapsed, Pimstein confessed to local police that that he had operated a Ponzi scheme and admitted that Ripley never purchased any electronics from The Bottom Line or Summit.

The SEC’s complaint charges Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. In its complaint, the SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and financial penalties against Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit, who have all agreed to settle the permanent injunctive portion of the SEC’s enforcement action without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations. In the partial settlements, Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit will pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and financial penalties, the amounts of which will be determined by the court at a later date.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida conducted a parallel investigation of this matter, and simultaneously announced the filing of criminal charges against Pimstein alleging mail and wire fraud. The SEC also acknowledges the assistance of the Miami Beach Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros of Chile (SVS) with its investigation.

The investigation is continuing.

# # #

For more information, contact:

Glenn S. Gordon
Associate Regional Director, SEC’s Miami Regional Office
(305) 982-6360

Chedly C. Dumornay
Assistant Regional Director, SEC’s Miami Regional Office
(305) 982-6377

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-258.htm

Indian Telemarketing Debt Collector Calls U.S. Customer Service Rep Who’s Job Got Displaced to India

This would be funny and ironic if it weren’t so sad. It may be an apocryphal story, but I suspect it’s true.

As most American’s know – especially ones who’ve held jobs in I.T. and customer service, many many jobs have been outsourced to India and other countries overseas. And of course recently there’s been a huge mortgage and credit crisis. Even consumers with relatively modest mortgages and credit card bills are losing homes, having trouble paying their bills, and having trouble finding work.

Enter “Donna Jones”  (somehow I couldn’t find “Donna” on any of the Indian baby name lists).

So you can probably guess the rest of the story, this debt collector from India started relentlessly calling the U.S. telemarketer who’s job had been outsourced to India. Needless to say the U.S. telemarketer was a bit outraged.

Now, I’m going to say something that might be unpopular, but I am NOT completely against outsourcing. But I AM against the way it’s been done so far. A couple valid reasons for outsourcing that COULD still help the U.S. economy are:

  • Allowing smaller companies to compete with larger companies, giving consumers better choices, and generating profits that can pay for higher-skilled local jobs (I’ve successfully done that at times, BUT most big companies seem to just want to outsource EVERYTHING without any regard to the quality of resulting work…and in that case, it doesn’t help the local economy at all).
  • Outsourcing work where it is difficult to find quality workers in the U.S.

Of course there are many other reasons that outsourcing isn’t being done correctly or where it is just plainly done unethically.

As the site OutsourceOutrage.com states:

“This is not about “us” versus “them.” Workers in every country deserve jobs with good pay and benefits and safe working conditions. But the current outsourcing and offshoring trends in the U.S. are hollowing out companies and our economy. These trends are producing greater income disparity, declining opportunity, and growing insecurity for U.S. workers and their families.”

Here’s a typical story from their site:

“Natasha, 31, was earning $90,000 a year with handheld computer maker Palm. After being flown to India to train people whom she later realized were her replacements, and despite promises made by Palm, Natasha was laid off” (more…)

FTC Launches New Web Site for Kids

www.ftc.gov/YouAreHere Teaches Key Concepts

The Federal Trade Commission today launched a new Web site to introduce kids to key
consumer and business concepts. Set in a shopping mall, http://www.ftc.gov/YouAreHere takes kids on an experiential journey that presents the FTC’s mission and its important role in American commerce. Kids under 12 are reported to spend billions of dollars on goods and services every year.

FTC.gov/YouAreHere links the important work of the FTC to the lives of children,”
said FTC Chairman William Kovacic. “It teaches kids how to be more savvy consumers by demonstrating the benefits of competition, how advertising can influence buying decisions, and the rules and regulations that many business people deal with. It’s a great tool for parents and teachers who are trying to help kids understand their role in the marketplace.”

The site features animated guides who help visitors navigate a virtual mall and interact with shopkeepers and other consumers. Kids can design and print advertisements for a shoe store, uncover suspicious claims in an ad, and guess the retail price of various candies based on their supply, demand, and production costs. One game that has players match the features of various cell phones with certain audiences illustrates the principles of target marketing; another allows visitors to compare sales pitches from three pizza joints as it explains competition. A short film playing at the cinema illustrates the history of the FTC.

For parents and teachers, the site offers fact sheets that cover advertising, marketing, and competition in more detail, along with ideas for related activities. “We hope that teachers will use the site in classroom activities that involve consumer economics, government, social studies, history, and language arts,” Chairman Kovacic said. “It takes a unique approach to both consumer tips and the role of business and government in daily life.”

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-3707
STAFF CONTACT:
Jennifer Leach
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3203

(You Are Here NR.wpd)