<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perfect Ultimate Search Engine Loophole Bonus!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-17253</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=538#comment-17253</guid>
		<description>Is TheRankingLoophole now obsolete?
I recall reading about this over a year ago, when &quot;the loophole&quot; was first &quot;discovered&quot;.
I am curious to know if it still exists and is of value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is TheRankingLoophole now obsolete?<br />
I recall reading about this over a year ago, when &#8220;the loophole&#8221; was first &#8220;discovered&#8221;.<br />
I am curious to know if it still exists and is of value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Groenewoud</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-14706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Groenewoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=538#comment-14706</guid>
		<description>Would this also apply to my site, I am not selling any products. My site is just basically a fan site and I just want to show the world why I love it so much.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vampirehigh.org/The%20Mansbridge%20Experiment.html&quot;&gt;Vampire High - The Mansbridge Experiment&lt;a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this also apply to my site, I am not selling any products. My site is just basically a fan site and I just want to show the world why I love it so much.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vampirehigh.org/The%20Mansbridge%20Experiment.html">Vampire High &#8211; The Mansbridge Experiment</a><a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-13918</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=538#comment-13918</guid>
		<description>I purchased the Loophole ebook in September 2009 and got a very competitive keyword to the #4 spot in about 6 weeks with a small network.  I think it works great.  It is expensive to setup so many sites on your own, though.  That is why I setup a co-operative for Loophole owners at Helioza.com.  It is free to join - you just have to own a copy of The Ultimate Search Engine Loophole.  And no, you don&#039;t have to buy it from me.  By the way, it is easy to get sites indexed by using the Bing webmaster tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased the Loophole ebook in September 2009 and got a very competitive keyword to the #4 spot in about 6 weeks with a small network.  I think it works great.  It is expensive to setup so many sites on your own, though.  That is why I setup a co-operative for Loophole owners at Helioza.com.  It is free to join &#8211; you just have to own a copy of The Ultimate Search Engine Loophole.  And no, you don&#8217;t have to buy it from me.  By the way, it is easy to get sites indexed by using the Bing webmaster tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-7315</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=538#comment-7315</guid>
		<description>I can vouch for the fact that the loophole method works and works very well.I have only got 100 blogs on many class c ips but I get great rankings in msn for my sites I have added to linkubaiter.The biggest issue with the whole thing is getting your blogs indexed in msn.It can take literally months to get them in there and out of my 100 blogs all built in january/feb only 40 or so are fullly indexed .This is the frustration that is stopping me from building more cause ive tried every method I can lay my hands on to get them indexed and still no joy..amy ideas ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can vouch for the fact that the loophole method works and works very well.I have only got 100 blogs on many class c ips but I get great rankings in msn for my sites I have added to linkubaiter.The biggest issue with the whole thing is getting your blogs indexed in msn.It can take literally months to get them in there and out of my 100 blogs all built in january/feb only 40 or so are fullly indexed .This is the frustration that is stopping me from building more cause ive tried every method I can lay my hands on to get them indexed and still no joy..amy ideas ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/04/about-the-ultimate-search-engine-loophole/comment-page-1/#comment-7137</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=538#comment-7137</guid>
		<description>Andy, my business partner and I already have a large network of sites and we were planning to incorporate loophole as part of our overall system - but we&#039;ve gotten so far behind with additional programming that has to be done with that project that we never got to it.

I think Chris Rempell did a special Warrior Webinar on loophole, but I&#039;m about to crash so I&#039;ll have to look that up tomorrow. It&#039;s something I need to follow up on anyhow to see if incorporating the Ranking Loophole system into our overall network makes sense AND to check out rumors claiming that Google was banning sites based on the Loophole even though they were fine in MSN (based on how the sites are developed though that doesn&#039;t really make any sense so I&#039;m a bit skeptical of those rumors.

I couldn&#039;t agree with you more on Eric&#039;s site. He runs a great site with a lot of great free training and REAL reviews where he really looks out for his visitors/subscribers.

I did a quick post recommending &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/02/06/ericstips-com-recommended/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EricsTips here&lt;/a&gt; back on 2/6/2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, my business partner and I already have a large network of sites and we were planning to incorporate loophole as part of our overall system &#8211; but we&#8217;ve gotten so far behind with additional programming that has to be done with that project that we never got to it.</p>
<p>I think Chris Rempell did a special Warrior Webinar on loophole, but I&#8217;m about to crash so I&#8217;ll have to look that up tomorrow. It&#8217;s something I need to follow up on anyhow to see if incorporating the Ranking Loophole system into our overall network makes sense AND to check out rumors claiming that Google was banning sites based on the Loophole even though they were fine in MSN (based on how the sites are developed though that doesn&#8217;t really make any sense so I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of those rumors.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more on Eric&#8217;s site. He runs a great site with a lot of great free training and REAL reviews where he really looks out for his visitors/subscribers.</p>
<p>I did a quick post recommending <a href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/02/06/ericstips-com-recommended/" rel="nofollow">EricsTips here</a> back on 2/6/2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

