How to be a conman

Have you ever wondered how famous conmen have been able to tell so many lies and get away with it? And have wondered how some of the greatest conman pulled off their elaborate schemes – sometimes even for decades.

Conmen seem to have a strange allure and repulsiveness at the same time. Repulsiveness because of the victims they hurt, but allure because of either the cunningness or audacity of their scams and fraud.

While there are technical aspects to cons – especially the modern conman, perhaps more important are the psychological aspects of running a con.

Lynn Edgington of Eagle Research Associates just published a terrific piece called How Conmen Cover Themselves With Spin To Get Away With It.

The article is a great read for anyone who wants to have a non-technical set of red-flags to look for when evaluating if something is a possible scam.

Click here to read this fascinating and helpful article about conmen at EagleResearchAssociates.org.

Dallas Businessmen Involved in Mortgage Fraud Scheme Sentenced to Federal Prison

1/23/2009 United States Department of Justice via the F.B.I. Website:

DALLAS—Three Dallas businessmen, Mark Manners, Robert L. Loeb, and Andrew Siebert, who were involved in a massive mortgage fraud scheme that they ran in the area, were sentenced this afternoon by U.S. District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn, announced James T. Jacks, acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas.

Mark Manners was sentenced to 30 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $1,762,362.71 in restitution.

Robert L. Loeb was sentenced to 18 months in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $2,027,841,34 restitution.

Andrew Siebert was sentenced to 60 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $2,027,841.34 restitution.

Their co-defendant in the scheme, Charles Cooper Burgess, 53, was sentenced in March 2008 to nearly 22 years in prison and ordered to pay more than $3 million in restitution for his role in this mortgage fraud scheme and another scheme involving golf course property in Arkansas.  Burgess pled guilty in January 2006 to his involvement in two fraudulent schemes, one involving mortgage fraud and one involving defrauding individuals who invested in golf course property in Arkansas.  In November and December 2006, Burgess testified about Manners and Siebert’s extensive role in the mortgage fraud scheme.  At the conclusion of that trial, both Manners and Siebert were convicted.

Regarding the mortgage fraud scheme, Burgess admitted that he recruited 20 straw buyers with good credit but limited funds to sign loan and closing documents to purchase homes.  As part of a signed “investor management agreement,” Burgess promised to provide the down payment at closing as well as make all mortgage payments.  When Burgess’s company needed additional funds for borrower down payments, Siebert agreed to steal bank escrow funds for the borrowers’ down payment.  As part of the scheme, Siebert also falsified settlement document on at least 20 loan closings.  Siebert only agreed to steal these escrow funds if Burgess agreed to pay Siebert $5000 from each closing as a “kickback payment.”  Evidence at trial showed that Siebert stole escrow funds on 20 separate loans and then concealed the theft of these lender funds by falsifying loan closing documents.

Siebert stole lender funds held in escrow and then provided these funds to Manners prior to closing so that Manners could purchase a cashier’s check in the name of the straw buyer.  When Siebert received the cashier’s check back from Manners, Siebert falsely certified to the lender on the settlement statement that the down payment came from the borrower.  On the settlement statement, Siebert also fraudulently accounted for disbursements to Burgess’ company by falsely listing the expense as a phony lien pay off, or as a “marketing and relocation fee” due to Burgess’ company.  Eleven different lenders testified at trial that Siebert falsified the settlement statements to conceal his wrongful and fraudulent release of lender escrow funds.  Each lender testified that the loan would never have been funded if the lender had known about the fraudulent use of lender escrow funds.

From December 2002 through March 2004, Siebert stole escrow funds which resulted in the loss of $2,027,841 to 16 different lenders.  As a result of Siebert submitting false certifications on settlement statements for each of these 20 loans, Siebert and Manners fraudulently induced the disbursement of loans totaling more than $7 million.

Acting U.S. Attorney Jacks praised the investigative efforts of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Inspector General.  The case was prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney William M. Martin of the U.S. Department of Justice Anti-Trust Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney David Jarvis.

SUBURBAN BUSINESSMAN CHARGED WITH BILKING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM HUNDREDS OF INVESTORS IN ALLEGED 22-YEAR “PONZI” SCHEME

1/23/2009 Department of Justice Press Release via the F.B.I.:

CHICAGO – A suburban businessman who promised hundreds of investors between 10 and 15 percent annual interest rates on promissory notes he sold them was charged today with operating a so-called “Ponzi” scheme for more than 20 years, resulting in losses estimated in tens of millions of dollars. The defendant, Frank A. Castaldi, was charged with mail fraud in a federal criminal complaint filed today in U.S. District Court, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Castaldi, 55, of Prospect Heights , was expected to surrender voluntarily for an initial appearance at 1:30 p.m. today before Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan in U.S. District Court.

According to the complaint, during approximately the early to mid-1980s, Castaldi, his father, and a business partner started two businesses – CZ Travel and CZ Realty. They later purchased ownership interests in First State Travel Service, Inc., Parkway Towers Insurance Agency, Inc., and Cumberland Realty, Inc., which later became known as Remax Cumberland Realty, all currently located at 4501 North Cumberland in Norridge , with Castaldi identified as the president of each business.

Beginning in at least approximately 1986, Castaldi allegedly began offering and selling month promissory notes to investors, the majority of whom were people who were referred to him by other investors, and included friends, family members and customers of his businesses. While the vast majority of notes stated that the annual interest rate was zero percent, Castaldi allegedly orally guaranteed that he would pay investors annual returns between 10 and 15 percent.

Castaldi allegedly made false representations to most investors about investing their principal in his various businesses, as well as the source of the funds that he used to make their interest payments. At least five years ago, Castaldi allegedly began falsely telling investors that he was placing their money with financial institutions with whom he had a special relationship and would guarantee their principal and high returns. Instead, Castaldi obtained loans and used certain investors’ principal payments to make interest payments to other investors, without disclosing the true source of the interest payments, the charges allege.

The complaint affidavit states that there are approximately 200 to 300 investors whose principal has not yet been returned and estimates that the outstanding principal owed to these investors is in the tens of millions of dollars. In 2008 alone, Castaldi allegedly renewed or issued promissory notes bearing a total face value of approximately $68 million to $69 million, in many instances representing the face value of investors’ initial notes plus the investors’ accumulated interest which had been rolled back into the notes.

In addition to using new investors’ principal to make interest payments and return principal to earlier investors, Castaldi also lost investors’ money by funding his failed banquet hall and other failing businesses, and to purchase some stocks, the charges allege. It is believed that neither Castaldi nor his businesses have the money to pay back the investors, the complaint states.

Law enforcement authorities are currently in the process of identifying potential victims in this case. Individuals who believe they are victims but have not received information by mail by the end of February, should contact the U.S. Attorney’s Office Victim Assistance Program either by calling 1-866-364-2621 and leave a name, address and phone number, or sending an email to usailn.victim.aa@usdoj.gov and information will be mailed.

The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Christopher Veatch and Sunil Harjani.

If convicted, mail fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

The Court, however, would determine the appropriate sentence to be imposed under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The public is reminded that a complaint contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt.

The defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.