FTC Testifies About Efforts to Combat Fraudulent and Deceptive Advertising

7/22/2009 FTC press release about fraudulent and deceptive advertising

The Federal Trade Commission testified today before the U.S. Senate on its efforts to combat deceptive advertising in the face of rapid changes in health care, technology, and online marketing strategies.

In testimony before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation’s
Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Insurance, David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, described the Commission’s recent law enforcement and regulatory efforts addressing deceptive advertising.

“The task of monitoring and pursuing false and deceptive advertising claims has grown larger and more complex over the past few decades,” Vladeck testified. “Significantly, however, the Commission’s resources to tackle deceptive advertising, as well as the other important consumer issues addressed by the agency’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, have not increased enough.”

Vladeck discussed health and safety claims, the use of endorsements and testimonials,
environmental marketing or “green” claims, and advertising that preys on victims of the economic downturn as among the many important advertising issues faced by the FTC. In the
past year alone, the FTC has challenged advertising claims for weight loss, cold prevention, improved concentration, and diabetes and cancer “cures.” In a major law enforcement sweep conducted with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Competition Bureau of Canada, the FTC announced 11 actions against companies and individuals for making false and unsubstantiated claims that a wide range of products could cure or treat cancer.

The testimony also discussed Commission’s efforts to update its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising. Based on the prevalent – and sometimes deceptive – use of third-party endorsements in advertising, the FTC adopted the Guides in 1980. Although the basic principles of the Guides still hold true, dramatic changes have occurred during the last three decades in how products are marketed – most notably, program-length infomercials, Internet advertising, word-of-mouth or viral marketing, and consumer blogs have all become commonplace. Vladeck testified that it also has become clear that “results not typical” and other disclaimers of typicality commonly used in endorsements and testimonials are not working as intended to prevent consumer deception.

Vladeck told the subcommittee that the proliferation of advertisers proclaiming the “green” attributes of their products has led the FTC to review its Green Guides, the centerpiece of the agency’s environmental marketing program. The Commission’s latest enforcement actions charged three companies with disseminating false and unsubstantiated claims that their
products – disposable plates, wipes, and towels – were “biodegradable.” Two of the cases have settled, and the third is in litigation, Vladeck said.

In response to the rise in financial distress scams, on July 1, 2009, the Commission announced “Operation Short Change,” a joint initiative with 14 states, the Department of Justice, and other agencies that included more than 120 law enforcement actions. As part of this operation, the FTC brought eight new cases against companies that have conned consumers, and took action in seven additional cases earlier this year challenging similar misconduct. The new cases include one against the marketers of “John Beck’s Free & Clear Real Estate System,” a widely publicized get-rich-quick scheme, Vladeck testified. The Commission alleged that these schemes, promoted through misleading infomercials and on the Internet, have duped hundreds of thousands of consumers out of about $300 million.

The Commission vote authorizing the testimony was 4-0.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

(Advertising Testimony.wpd)
(FTC File No. P064502)

Defendants Settle with FTC in Surplus Goods Business Opportunity Scam

7/14/2009 FTC press release:

Scammers who duped consumers into paying a total of more than $30 million for bogus business opportunities have settled Federal Trade Commission charges that their deceptive claims violated federal law. The settlements prohibit future violations by the defendants, who promised consumers that they would receive access to overstocked merchandise, expert training in the surplus goods industry, and substantial income.

The FTC sued the defendants in February 2005 as part of “Project Biz Opp Flop,” a crackdown on deceptive business opportunity and work-at-home schemes. The settlements entered last April ban the defendants from the business opportunity and franchise industries and prohibit them from misrepresenting any goods or services. The settlement orders also bar the defendants from selling or otherwise benefitting from personal information about customers who paid them before the orders were entered. In addition, the orders impose a $30.7 million judgment, which is suspended based on the defendants’ inability to pay. The full judgment will be imposed if they are found to have misrepresented their financial condition. The settlements also contain standard record-keeping and reporting provisions to allow the FTC to monitor compliance.

The defendants are Sheldon and Judith Takala Fidler and nine companies they controlled: World Traders Association, Inc., United Traders Association, Inc., International Merchandise Group, Inc., Trans-Global Connections, Inc., Musketeer Partners, Inc., Fulfillment Options, Inc., International Associates Worldwide, Inc., Magna Delta, LLC, and Office Options, LLC. The Commission vote authorizing the filing of the stipulated judgments and orders for permanent injunction was 4-0. The orders were entered by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. Four other defendants previously settled FTC charges related to this scheme.

In March 2007, in a related criminal proceeding instituted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, Sheldon Fidler pleaded guilty to two counts of mail fraud and received a 60-month prison sentence; he is currently in jail. Judith Fidler pleaded guilty to one count of criminal contempt and received two years of probation.

NOTE: Stipulated court orders are for settlement purposes only and do not necessarily constitute an admission by the defendants of a law violation. Stipulated orders have the force of law when signed by the judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
Arturo DeCastro,
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2747

(FTC File No. X050021)
(World Traders)

BBB Warning about 3HourProfits

The BBB recently issued a warning about 3HourProfits. According to a recent BBB Hot Topic alert:

“3hourprofits.com is an email work-at-home scam that has been using the BBB name to boost its reputation. The website claimes employees can make over $10,000 a month. The website also claims the “BBB Review rated it the number one work from home opportunity.” Sorry, but there is no such thing as the BBB Review. This is a scam!”

Of interest to me are the sites where the owners apparently BELIEVED that the BBB had ranked 3HourProfits #1. How is that even remotely possible that ANYONE believe it.

But believe it they did. And who believed it?

IMReviewKings – a site owned by Brian Garvin and Jeff West – states this in their write-up of the 3HourProfits.com opportunity:

“Mr. Miller definitely leaves a lot of intrigue to find out more. Things like their sixty day program guarantee, the $2,500 bonus pay, and then of course the BBB review ranking them #1 really leaves a good taste in your mouth. ”

Looks to me like these “IM Review Kings” are about to be dethroned!

Click here for the original BBB Hot Topic Alert on 3HourProfits (bottom of page)