<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profit Miracle Quick Shot sales page review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/08/08/profit-miracle-quick-shot-sales-page-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/08/08/profit-miracle-quick-shot-sales-page-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/08/08/profit-miracle-quick-shot-sales-page-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12874</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=2585#comment-12874</guid>
		<description>CZA,

The post clearly sales its sales copy review. It&#039;s actually rare that I post an affiliate link or make a &quot;guess&quot; without buying the product, but I understand your point. All the other actual product reviews on the site are based on buying the products.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever done a sales copy review where I&#039;ve done what I did here.

Sales copy reviews are incredibly valuable and some of the data from ones on the site you are on (WorkAtHomeTruth) have been used by consumer organizations such as the National Consumers League, the FTC in one of their recent operation shortchange cases, and as research by National Media (MarketPlace and 20/20).

Ultimately I shouldn&#039;t have mixed the fish and put a &quot;guess&quot; at product with sales copy. Although I have NO problem NOT RECOMMENDING a product if I see sales copy rife with major issues as was done back in my NOVEMBER 19, 2008 write up of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/19/google-money-tree-complaints/&quot;&gt;Google Money Tree here&lt;/a&gt; which was picked up on by the National Consumers League, but ultimately not shut down until July of 2009.

More recently was the write up of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/10/11/datamoneyonline-salespage-review/&quot;&gt;DataMoneyOnline.com&lt;/a&gt;.

Having covered thousands of flogs and done detailed write-ups of hundreds of questionable sales pages I&#039;ll take it upon myself to allow for a minor mistake here and there. That&#039;s the beauty of a (mostly) uncensored blog. People with additional details to add like you can come and flesh out any potential errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CZA,</p>
<p>The post clearly sales its sales copy review. It&#8217;s actually rare that I post an affiliate link or make a &#8220;guess&#8221; without buying the product, but I understand your point. All the other actual product reviews on the site are based on buying the products.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever done a sales copy review where I&#8217;ve done what I did here.</p>
<p>Sales copy reviews are incredibly valuable and some of the data from ones on the site you are on (WorkAtHomeTruth) have been used by consumer organizations such as the National Consumers League, the FTC in one of their recent operation shortchange cases, and as research by National Media (MarketPlace and 20/20).</p>
<p>Ultimately I shouldn&#8217;t have mixed the fish and put a &#8220;guess&#8221; at product with sales copy. Although I have NO problem NOT RECOMMENDING a product if I see sales copy rife with major issues as was done back in my NOVEMBER 19, 2008 write up of <a href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/11/19/google-money-tree-complaints/">Google Money Tree here</a> which was picked up on by the National Consumers League, but ultimately not shut down until July of 2009.</p>
<p>More recently was the write up of <a href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/10/11/datamoneyonline-salespage-review/">DataMoneyOnline.com</a>.</p>
<p>Having covered thousands of flogs and done detailed write-ups of hundreds of questionable sales pages I&#8217;ll take it upon myself to allow for a minor mistake here and there. That&#8217;s the beauty of a (mostly) uncensored blog. People with additional details to add like you can come and flesh out any potential errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CZA</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/08/08/profit-miracle-quick-shot-sales-page-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12873</link>
		<dc:creator>CZA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=2585#comment-12873</guid>
		<description>Two comments:

1) How can you review a product without BUYING it? While I applaud your attempt to help people think about the ad copy, this can hardly be considered a review.

2) As of this day, the OBB (Online Business Bureau), the logo of which is posted on the Profit Miracle site as a &quot;trusted&quot; member, has Miracle Profit rated as a red &quot;beware&quot; site, due to unresolved customer complaints. Do check these things out before buying Profit Miracle Machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two comments:</p>
<p>1) How can you review a product without BUYING it? While I applaud your attempt to help people think about the ad copy, this can hardly be considered a review.</p>
<p>2) As of this day, the OBB (Online Business Bureau), the logo of which is posted on the Profit Miracle site as a &#8220;trusted&#8221; member, has Miracle Profit rated as a red &#8220;beware&#8221; site, due to unresolved customer complaints. Do check these things out before buying Profit Miracle Machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

