Upon seeing True-Money.com and some of the comments about True-Money.com I began to realize that there are two types of people looking to build a business online.
The ones who keep throwing away their money in programs like True-Money.com that can never possibly work based on pure math. And those who actually realize that they will have to do some real WORK to build a business.
The dead giveaway that a program like True-Money.com is destined for failure is the statement “No Recruiting Required”. Programs like these have NEVER been sustainable and they NEVER will be. And even if they WERE somehow mathematically sustainble, it would take a huge amount of media buying knowledge to make it all happen – but again, I see no way that a program like True-Money.com can be self-sustaining.
And why are the SAME people giving testimonials several times on the testimonials page?
And how about those 445.34 worth of products with resale rights? NOPE!
Some of those products have been floating around the internet since the early 2000s and have been given away free all over the place. If I were to stretch my imagination a bit, I MIGHT consider the whole package to be worth maybe 20 bucks.
If you keep getting suckered into programs like True-Money.com only to be disappointed – here’s a tip…
STOP looking for “easy ways to make millions of dollars!”
Related:
Top 10 Recommended Home Business (WARNING: You aren’t going to fall off a chair and make money with these)
Paul, my guess is that there will always be people who fall for the Pascal’s Wager fallacy: well it is very unlikely that I will make $1 million, but even if the chance is small, I should take it. What these people anchor upon is a small chance being 1% rather than 0%.
That makes sense, Michael.
I also think since time is such a valuable commodity these days, people may think “well, I can risk ‘no time’” or I can actually work and risk real time without any guarantee of an outcome.
OK. I’ve started reading up on Pascal’s Wager as I only know the concept in passing. Fascinating and useful to think about.
OK. I’ve started reading up on Pascal’s Wager as I only know the concept in passing. Fascinating and useful to think about.
Sorry… forgot to say great post – can’t wait to read your next one!
Here is a couple of posts I have written about Pascal’s wager and how it applies to business opportunities.
http://www.bizop.ca/blog2/books/the-road-from-f.html
http://www.bizop.ca/blog2/complaints-and-investigations/logic-of-misrep.html
And this one, I think is probably the best.
http://www.bizop.ca/blog2/due-diligence/when-magical-thinking-works-it.html
Michael, in the first post, is the one sentence that states “Whereas, I might pay very little to play G2, I might spend much more to play G2.” supposed to be “Whereas, I might pay very little to play G2, I might spend much more to play G1″?