Alternatives to the “usual” advertising sources

The other day I was pulling some competition data from KeywordSpy and came across an interesting advertising Internet Radio option that I hadn’t heard of called TargetSpot. Here are the details:

Internet Radio via TargetSpot.com

From the TargetSpot site:

“TargetSpot is the first end to end advertising platform and marketplace designed specifically for internet radio.

Advertisers use TargetSpot’s award-winning platform to reach and target internet radio listeners with high-impact audio and video advertising. Traditional and web-only broadcasters alike turn to TargetSpot for its unique ability to support the growth of their streaming products and audience through its innovative advertising technology.

Since launch in 2007, TargetSpot has received numerous awards and recognition, including Always On’s “Always On Media 100,” Inside Radio’s “Seven Changing Radio Now” and Radio-Info.com’s “Radio’s Innovators”.”

I went through the tour and a few important points to understand:

  • By default, the campaign is set to run-of-network, but you can also target geographically, by program type (such as Rock, Country, Sports, Talk, etc.) and you can daypart
  • Your advertisement can be done via uploading an mp3 file or using TargetSpot’s record by mike service
  • TargetSpot ads are sold on a CPM or “cost per thousand” basis, which means advertisers are billed per every thousand deliveries of their advertisement.
  • TargetSpot enables advertisers to control how much they are willing to spend per CPM and control their monthly budget
  • Advertisements are delivered through commercial spots and synchronized, clickable graphics can be displayed while the advertisement is playing.

Click here to visit TargetSpot.com

BBB posts possible concerns about Narc That Car

From the BBB website:

“Questions are still being raised about a business opportunity from Narc That Car. Crowd Sourcing International (CSI), formerly known as Narc Technologies, claims that independent consultants can earn money by collecting information about car license plates, by recruiting more consultants, and by recruiting clients to buy the information.

Ed Laskos of FOX-11 Los Angeles reports on the “red flags” about Narc That Car. Jeannette Kopko, spokesperson for the Better Business Bureau (BBB) in Dallas, says the BBB hasn’t received information about clients and “the BBB is very concerned that this company’s marketing plan may be a pyramid scheme.”

The following is the FOX-11 video the BBB references:

Click here to view the BBB report on Narc That Car

The core concern the BBB seems to have with Narc That Car is contained in the following paragraphs pulled from their reliability report:

“On February 8, 2010, the BBB received information from the company regarding its compensation practices. However, the BBB remains concerned as to whether the business model, in practice, truly provides any significant method of compensation which would not require sponsorship of additional program participants.

According to the company, as of February 10, 2010, only 1% of total commissions paid out to independent consultants was for the sale of license plate information to third parties, referred to as “client share.” Previously, the company’s “client share” income was the only repeatable form of compensation which did not involve the recruitment of others into the opportunity. However, as of March 1, 2010, the company has provided a modified compensation plan which allows for base-level independent consultants to receive commission payments.”

Related:

FTC Endorsement Rules Get Their First Workout (from CitMediaLaw)

From CitMediaLaw.org:

“The Federal Trade Commission has announced that it has completed its first investigation under the “blog-ola” rules it adopted last year, which require bloggers and other social media posters who receive a free or discounted product or service to disclose the freebie in their reviews or commentary about the product or service, or face the possibility of an FTC enforcement action.  See “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising,” 16 CFR Part 255 (2010) (html) (pdf).

In the end, the FTC decided not to take any action against Ann Taylor (decision letter), whose Loft division (formerly Ann Taylor Loft) offered gifts to bloggers who attended a January 26 “exclusive blogger preview” of the chain’s summer 2010 line.”

Click here to read more at CitMediaLaw.org

So much for those who thought the FTC was primarily interested in going after the floggers. Besides, it’s a lot easier to find Ann Taylor.

Related: