Internet-News-Daily.com Quickshot Review

There’s not much new with Internet-News-Daily.com (a.k.a. ”Online Jobs Journal”) but, it’s interesting to continue to see the increase in flogging after the July FTC crackdown on negative option scams that used affiliate flogs  as a primary presales technique. The type of flog (fake blog) being used in these cases used fake stories with fake screenshots of checks and fake testimonials.

As we’ve seen before the amount of traffic sites like Internet-News-Daily.com continue to get is alarmingly high:   Compete-internet-news-daily-com_uv

Internet-News-Daily.com tells the familiar Mary Steadman story which claims that she makes $7,000/month submitting small texts and ads on Google….ah, whatever happened to the good ol’ days of just posting “links”? ;-)

You may want to take a look at Michael Brown’s write up about the to  “Make Money Posting Links on Google Scam” if you aren’t sure what I’m talking about in that last remark.

Internet-News-Daily’s recommendation of Google Profits

"Kevin M." and family - a.k.a. iStockPhoto 00006556811

"Kevin M." and family - a.k.a. iStockPhoto 00006556811

If you click through on the Internet-News-Daily Google Biz Kit link you”ll be taken to a page on site called SecureFormNet.com which promotes a program called Google Profits which bizarrely claims to be a trademarked name. I guess their next move will be to claim trademark rights for the Google logo they’re using on their site. ;-)

Google Profits presents a testimonial from “Kevin M.” who claims to “make more money at home watching TV” than (he) was at (his) previous job working 9-5″.

As usual Google Profits is using a stock photo for this testimonial. What’s a bit strange though is that they don’t have the usual weird disclaimer saying that they are using alternate pictures to protect the privacy of the person giving the testimonial.

And of course there are the usual ABC, MSN, CNN, and USAToday logos with no explanation at all as to why they are there.

But probably the funniest thing on the page is the “HURRY, Only 57 Kits Left!” considering that the whole sentence is part of a larger image.

The Google Profits order page contains all too familiar elements:

"Aaron H." performing his duties as a stock photo at IStockPhoto

"Aaron H." performing his duties as a stock photo at IStockPhoto

Of course there is requisite stock photo used for the testimonial on Google Profits’ order page, which I just bought from iStockPhoto.

Apparently Google Profits must get tons of refund requests really fast, because the order page states that there are “Only 37 Kits Left!” (again the phrase is part of the image), but when I went back to the original page 3 seconds later there were 57 Kits Left again.

Assuming a 12-hour sales day, that would be 20 refunds per minute x 720 minutes = 14,400 refunds per day!

Anyhow…finishing up the order page we find the terms in tiny white print at the bottom of the page AFTER the large graphic ”FREE TRIAL!” arrow which points to the large red “Rush My Kit!” image, which state:

“I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy/Terms and Conditions. By submitting this form, I am ordering the Google Profit™ CD trial for $1.97 shipping and handling, after the 30 day trial I will be charged $99 for the program. I also  agree to the 14 day trial to Google Profit Resource membership for 47.50 per month there after should i choose do not cancel. Charges will appear on credit/debit statements as “GoogCD866-995-9812″. For questions, call 1-866-995-9812 M-F, 6am-7pm, PST.”

For “some” reason the hyperlink for “Privacy Policy” is in the traditional blue hyperlink convention whereas the Terms and Conditions hyperlink is not. Hmmm. I wonder why they did that? ;-)

Hyperlink coloring at the bottom of the Google Profits Order Page

Hyperlink coloring at the bottom of the Google Profits Order Page. Click for full image.

Even more interesting is the fact that in the actual terms and conditions there is the potential for ANOTHER monthly charge NOT mentioned at the bottom of the page. The last part of “Fees and Pricing” under the Terms and Conditions states:

“You have also been enrolled into a seven (7) day trial to the eBay Money Resource Center. Should you choose not to cancel your eBay Money Resource Center, you will be billed seven dollars and seventy one cents ($7.71) each month for the eBay Money Resource Center. If you wish to cancel your eBay Money Resource Center subscription, please call 1-800-215-1752 to cancel.”

How much money is the affiliate running Internet-News-Daily making?

Obviously, I don’t know his exact numbers, but my best guess is that a presell like Internet-News-Daily.com would convert this type of “biz kit” offer at between 5% to 10%, but even if you assume a 10% clickthrough rate on the fake news site to the Google Profits site which it promotes then you get the following astonishing number:

(800,000 unique visitors) x (10% clickthrough on Internet-News-Daily) x (5% conversion rate) = 4,000 conversions per month from just one affiliate.

To get a sense of how much companies are paying for leads on these types of offers I took a look at a couple of the affiliate network comparison engines – OfferVault.com and oDigger.com and it appears the payout averages around $30.00 per lead.

If that affiliate is earning $30.00 per conversion, then he or she is bringing in $120,000.00 per month before expenses.

Considering that the affiliate is likely running multiple offers in different markets where flogs are pervasive – i.e. health, diet, anti-aging, teeth-whitening, etc. - it’s not unreasonable to conclude that one affiliate could be bringing in nearly a half million dollars per month (before expenses), if not more.

It seems a safe bet that given these types of numbers, flogs promoting questionable negative option offers will be around for a VERY long time.

ProfitsAtHome.com QuickShot review

I’m not going to go into a lot of detail about ProfitsAtHomeNow.com right now, but it did come up as a top referrer for the site TheDailyTribuneOnline.com so I thought ProfitsAtHomeNow should be discussed a bit.

The first thing that jumps out are the pictures used on ProfitsAtHomeNow which are the same pictures that have been used over the past year on various flogs (fake blogs). Note, ProfitsAtHomeNow.com isn’t technically a flog, but it IS using the pictures found all over the internet on many of the fake blogs.

Bizarrely, ProfitsAtHome.com puts the following disclaimer:

“To protect their privacy the above images do not reflect the person who submitted the testimonial.”

While that MAY be true about ProfitsAtHome.com’s testimonials, in general anytime you see that disclaimer these days it should raise a HUGE RED FLAG.

What’s happened in many cases is that websites have been being busted either – either formally or informally – for using fake testimonials. And now many of them are scrambling to cover their behinds by putting up disclaimers stating basically “Yeh, our testimonials are fake, but we’re OK, because we’re telling you they’re fake”.

By the way, the disclaimers are usually longer than the one on ProfitsAtHome.com and go something like this:

“*INCOME CLAIM WARNING: Testimonials do not result typical result. Photographs or images are depiction of individuals and payment methods. These income examples are representative of some of the most successful participants in the program. Some individuals purchasing the program may make little or NO MONEY AT ALL. These claims are not a guarantee of your income, nor are they typical of average participants. Individual results will vary greatly and in accordance to your input, determination, hard work, and ability to follow directions. No person or company can guarantee profits or freedom from loss.”

Here’s an EASIER DISCLAIMER for all the FLOGS and sites that feel the need to “protect the privacy” of the people in the testimonials:

UNIVERSAL WEBSITE DISCLAIMER/WARNING: Everything you read on this site is probably just a bunch of nonsense.

That should cover it, eh?

The IRONY of “Protecting the Privacy” of testimonial givers

Here’s the biggest irony of flogs “protecting the privacy” of testimonial givers: MANY of the testimonials used on Flogs were proven to be STOLEN which is the MAIN REASON I can think of using an alternate photo (say a stock photo) to protect someone’s privacy – although I don’t even know if it’s legal to do so.

Products that ProfitsAtHomeNow.com promotes:

ProfitsAtHomeNow.com promotes the following two products:

Runner up (i.e. #2) is a product called AuctionProfitCenter.com which promises to let you “Harness the Power of eBay with the FREE auction success kit”.

George and Samantha happy being iStockPhoto 000006112751

George and Samantha happy being iStockPhoto 000006112751

Apparently AuctionProfitCenter.com didn’t get the memo about the Testimonial Stock Photo images disclaimers as they just boldy threw up a testimonial allegedly from “George and Samantha” and using iStockPhoto’s stock photo 000006112751 – a.k.a. “Happy Couple at the Beach”.

Of course after enough people start pointing out that it’s a stock photo AuctionProfitCenter.com will likely “remember” to add some or all of the following disclaimer:

“*INCOME CLAIM WARNING: Testimonials do not result typical result. Photographs or images are depiction of individuals and payment methods. These income examples are representative of some of the most successful participants in the program. Some individuals purchasing the program may make little or NO MONEY AT ALL. These claims are not a guarantee of your income, nor are they typical of average participants. Individual results will vary greatly and in accordance to your input, determination, hard work, and ability to follow directions. No person or company can guarantee profits or freedom from loss.”

They might EVEN decide to NOT precheck the box that says “I agree to the terms and conditions”.

Maybe they’ll even explain exactly what they mean by “As seen on Yahoo!, YouTube, Google, CNN, MSN, and Forbes”.

The #1 product ProfitsAtHomeNow.com promotes is…

Ah, never mind. It’s probably just a bunch of nonsense anyhow.

Note: A few other sites similar to ProfitsAtHomeNow.com are:

  • BigProfitsAtHomeNow.com
  • MyHomeInternetBiz.com
  • LazyGuideToWealth.com

MyProfitSite QuickShot review

MyProfitSite claims that Jeff Jackson is a former WalMart worker now banking 4.2 million in profit every single year.

Here are a few things that concern me about MyProfitSite:

MyProfitSite.com is hosted on the same IP as RipOff-Review.org which is recommending it.

The following sites, including MyProfitSite.com are hosted on IP 67.212.182.186:

24-7-trading.com
Adwordprofitkit.com
Best-10-work-from-home.org
Fastauctionincome.com
Free-site-offer.com
Get-merchant-account.com
Get-web-visitors.com
Globalmediaultd.com
Googlemoneypro.biz
Googlesuccesscenter.com
Googlkit.com
Grantconnectioncenter.com
Homecashcourse.com
Homejobdailynews.com
Idptcr.com
Instant-online-income.com
Instantprofitpackage.com
Internet-career-finder.com
Jeffjacksonmyprofitsite.com
M0nstertrax.com
Media-hub.tv
Monstermarketing.tv
Myp-site.com
Myprofitsite.com
Myprofitsitescam.com
Mypsit.com
News21today.com
Nitricoxidemax.com
Powermaxacai.com
Ripoff-review.com
Ripoff-review.org
Ripoff-reviews.org
Ripoffs-exposed.org
Scam-hotline.org
Survey-broker.com
Survey-income.com
Surveyincomeplus.com
Svyclb.com
Theinternetsuccesscenter.com
Theworkathomereview.org
Top-10-work-from-home.com
Tradingfromhome.com
Webprofitclub.com
Yourworkathometop10.com

I’ve  mentioned before that the fewer sites that are hosted on the same IP – the more likely that the sites are owned by the same company or person.

So the issue here is that the site RipOff-Review.org has the following listed as it’s Top 3 recommended Work At Home Programs:

  1. MyProfitSite.com
  2. TradingFromHome.com
  3. Survey-Broker.com

Additionally, the following three sites share the same Google Analytics account (Google Analytics shows website owners how people found their site, and how they explored it:

  1. RipOff-Review.org
  2. TradingFromHome.com
  3. Survey-Broker.com

Each Google Analytics account uses a unique identifier. The above sites share the Google Analytics code “UA-4052966″. Normally each site would also append a different number, but in this case the person who operates the above 3 sites is using the same suffix for the Google Analytics code (UA-4052966-2) as you can see in the images below:

RipOff-Review.org Google analytics code

RipOff-Review.org Google analytics code

TradingFromHome.com Google analytics code

TradingFromHome.com Google analytics code

Survey-Broker.com Google analytics code
Survey-Broker.com Google analytics code

MyProfitSite.com and VerifiedSafePay.com

When I clicked to order MyProfitSite I was taking to an order page on a site called VerifiedSafePay.com.

The first thing I noticed was the non-clickable Authorize.net verified merchant seal. Now according to Authorize.net, to configure their Verified Merchant Seal a merchant does the following:

“Log into the Merchant Interface to configure the Web site domain(s) on which you would like to display the Verified Merchant Seal. Then copy and paste the generated seal HTML to the desired area(s) of your Web site(s). When a customer clicks on your Verified Merchant Seal, a site verification window appears showing that you are an active Authorize.Net merchant.”

Besides the fact that the Authorize.net seal on VerifiedSafePay.com is not clickable, it’s a bit strange that the VerifiedSafePay.com site would be hosting the Authorize.net Verified Merchant logo – which they are as you can see by the two images below:

vsp-authlogo-properties

VerifiedSafePay.com hosting Authorize.net image?

VerifiedSafePay.net hosting Authorize.net image

VerifiedSafePay.com hosting Authorize.net image

But before I go too far afield, let’s see what VerifiedSafePay.com has to say for itself:

“Verified Safe Pay Hub is an online payment site for select merchants that meet our good business practice standards. We make things easier for everyone by focusing on providing the best solutions, which is what we do best. ”

Hmmm. Not sure if I want to deal with merchants that meet YOUR good business practice standards.

Out of curiosity I bought a nameserver report from DomainTools.com to see what other domains were hosted on the same nameserver as VerifiedSafePays.com nameserver – i-tech-media.com:

24-7-TRADING.COM    PRIMARY
AUCTIONTOINCOME.COM    PRIMARY
BEST-10-WORK-FROM-HOME.ORG    PRIMARY
BEST10HOMEBUSINESS.ORG    PRIMARY
FREEWEBSITEHUB.COM    PRIMARY
GRANTCONNECTIONCENTER.COM    PRIMARY
HOMECASHCOURSE.COM    PRIMARY
HOMEJOBDAILYNEWS.COM    PRIMARY
I-TECH-MEDIA.COM    PRIMARY
INSTANT-TRAFFIC-NOW.COM    PRIMARY
INSTANTPROFITPACKAGE.COM    PRIMARY
LINDASMONEYTIPS.COM    PRIMARY
M0NSTERTRAX.COM    PRIMARY
MEDIA-HUB.BIZ    PRIMARY
MHTRAX6.COM    PRIMARY
MYFASTCASHKIT.COM    PRIMARY
MYPROFITSITE.COM    PRIMARY
RIPOFF-REVIEW.COM    PRIMARY
RIPOFF-REVIEW.ORG    PRIMARY
RIPOFF-REVIEWS.ORG    PRIMARY
RIPOFFS-EXPOSED.ORG    PRIMARY
SCAM-HOTLINE.ORG    PRIMARY
SURVEY-BROKER.COM    PRIMARY
THEWORKATHOMEREVIEW.ORG    PRIMARY
TOP-10-WORK-FROM-HOME.COM    PRIMARY
TRADINGFROMHOME.COM    PRIMARY
TWITTERPAYLOAD.COM    PRIMARY
VERIFIEDSAFEPAY.COM    PRIMARY
WARNING-WORKFROMHOME.COM    PRIMARY
YOURWORKATHOMETOP10.COM    PRIMARY
FASTAUCTIONINCOME.COM    SECONDARY

Amongst the other sites sharing the same name server with VerifiedSafePay.com are our old buddies:

  • MyProfitSite.com
  • TradingFromHome.com
  • Survey-Broker.com

Also, Best10HomeBusiness.org offers the follow as it’s top 3 “Certified” programs (whatever “certified” means):

  1. www. Trading From Home.com
  2. www. Home Cash Course.com
  3. www. Survey Broker.com

Another site that uses i-tech-media.com as it’s nameserver is HomeJobDailyNews.com which tells us the story of Connie Peterson and immediately relays the following quotation from her website:  “I get paid about $25 for every link I post on the Internet and I get paid every week… I make around $7200 a month right now”.

Hmm. Where have I heard that before?

Connie Peterson’s story is a bit confusing, though, because later on Connie says that she and her husband “Kevin” “happened upon a system called ” MyProfitSite” that taught them how to make money posting information online.”

Wow. Posting “information”. That sounds a LOT more complicated than posting “links” like she was first talking about.

I’m out. LOL.

Luckily there’s a woman at LindasTips.com who might have a good way to make money and even includes a close-up of a really blurry Google check. I was going to post a comment on her blog, but “Sadly” “Post comments have been disabled from malicious spam”.

I’m devastated.

Scam-Hotline.org "Certified" ClickBank report
Scam-Hotline.org “Certified” ClickBank report

Thankfully, I can take a look at one of the other sites using the i-tech-media.com name server and even hosted on our favorite I.P. – 67.212.182.186. Some guy named “William Tompkins” apparently has a “Certified Click Bank Report”.

I wonder what that means? Who certified it? Mickey Mouse?
Ugh. After I clicked to view the “Certified ClickBank Report” I just get a page at Scam-Hotline.org recommending the same three programs AGAIN…
Wait, why am I surprised about that. OK, I’m not.
Alrighty then…moving on down the ol’ i-tech-media.com name server list we have TheWorkAtHomeReview.org from “Mr. X – The Whistleblower” – and looks like based on Mr. X’s recommendations he should be blowing the whistle on himself!
Let’s see we have the following recommendations from TheWorkAtHomeReview.org:
  1. Dan David’s InstantProfitPackage.com
  2. Mackenzie Lee’s HomeCashCourse.com
  3. Alison Wright’s Survey-Broker.com

All of which reside on IP 67.212.182.186 along with TheWorkAtHomeReview.org

Warning-WorkFromHome.com throws in a minor wildcard by once again recommending TradingFromHome.com instead of HomeCashCourse:

  1. Dan David’s InstantProfitPackage.com
  2. Michael Chase’s TradingFromHome.com
  3. Alison Wright’s Survey-Broker.com

Last on the I-Tech-Media.com name server list is YourWorkAtHomeTop10.com which presents us with the following choices:

  1. Michael Chase’s TradingFromHome.com
  2. Mackenzie Lee’s HomeCashCourse.com
  3. Alison Wright’s Survey-Broker.com

Somehow I’m starting to sense a pattern here.