Regulatory Reform Over-The-Counter (OTC) Derivatives

5/13/2009 United States Treasury Deaprtment Press Release:

The crisis of the past 20 months has exposed critical gaps and weaknesses in our financial regulatory system. As risks built up, internal risk management systems, rating agencies and regulators simply did not understand or address critical behaviors until they had already resulted in catastrophic losses. Those failures have caused a dramatic loss of confidence in our financial institutions and have contributed to a severe recession.

Last March, Secretary Geithner laid out new regulatory rules of the road to ensure we never face a crisis of this magnitude again. An essential element of reform is the establishment of a comprehensive regulatory framework for over-the-counter derivatives, which under current law are largely excluded or exempted from regulation.

As the AIG situation has made clear, massive risks in derivatives markets have gone undetected by both regulators and market participants. But even if those risks had been better known, regulators lacked the proper authorities to mount an effective policy response.

Today, to address these concerns, the Obama Administration proposes a comprehensive regulatory framework for all Over-The-Counter derivatives.

Moving forward, the Administration will work with Congress to implement this framework and bring greater transparency and needed regulation to these markets. The Administration will also continue working with foreign authorities to promote the implementation of similar measures around the world to ensure our objectives are not undermined by weaker standards abroad.

Objectives of Regulatory Reform of OTC Derivatives Markets

  • Preventing Activities Within The OTC Markets From Posing Risk To The Financial System Regulators must have the following authority to ensure that participants do not engage in practices that put the financial system at risk:
  • The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the securities laws should be amended to require clearing of all standardized OTC derivatives through regulated central counterparties (CCP):
    • CCPs must impose robust margin requirements and other necessary risk controls and ensure that customized OTC derivatives are not used solely as a means to avoid using a CCP.
    • For example, if an OTC derivative is accepted for clearing by one or more fully regulated CCPs, it should create a presumption that it is a standardized contract and thus required to be cleared.
  • All OTC derivatives dealers and all other firms  who create large exposures to counterparties should be subject to a robust regime of prudential supervision and regulation, which will include:
      • Conservative capital requirements
      • Business conduct standards
      • Reporting requirements
      • Initial margin requirements with respect to bilateral credit exposures on both standardized and customized contracts
  • Promoting Efficiency And Transparency Within The OTC Markets — To ensure regulators would have comprehensive and timely information about the positions of each and every participant in all OTC derivatives markets, this new framework includes:
  • Amending the CEA and securities laws to authorize the CFTC and the SEC to impose:
      • Recordkeeping and reporting requirements (including audit trails).
      • Requirements for all trades not cleared by CCPs to be reported to a regulated trade repository.
        • CCPs and trade repositories must make aggregate data on open positions and trading volumes available to the public.
        • CCPs and trade repositories must make data on individual counterparty’s trades and positions available to federal regulators.
      • The movement of standardized trades onto regulated exchanges and regulated transparent electronic trade execution systems.
      • The development of a system for the timely reporting of trades and prompt dissemination of prices and other trade information.
      • The encouragement of regulated institutions to make greater use of regulated exchange-traded derivatives.
  • Preventing Market Manipulation, Fraud, And Other Market Abuses The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and securities laws should be amended to ensure that the CFTC and the SEC have:
    • Clear and unimpeded authority for market regulators to police fraud, market manipulation, and other market abuses.
    • Authority to set position limits on OTC derivatives that perform or affect a significant price discovery function with respect to futures markets.
    • A complete picture of market information from CCPs, trade repositories, and market participants to provide to market regulators.
  • Ensuring That OTC Derivatives Are Not Marketed Inappropriately To Unsophisticated Parties Current law seeks to protect unsophisticated parties from entering into inappropriate derivatives transactions by limiting the types of counterparties that could participate in those markets.  But the limits are not sufficiently stringent.
  • The CFTC and SEC are reviewing the participation limits in current law to recommend how the CEA and the securities laws should be amended to tighten the limits or to impose additional disclosure requirements or standards of care with respect to the marketing of derivatives to less sophisticated counterparties such as small municipalities.

###

REPORTS

Crozet Man Pleads Guilty to Running Ponzi Scheme

5/11/2009 U. S. Department of Justice  Press Release via the FBI Website:

United States Attorney Julia C. Dudley announced today that John Mark Donnelly, age 52, of Crozet, Virginia, pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Charlottesville today to an information charging him with numerous illegal activities related to a Ponzi scheme that bilked victims of more than $5 million.

Donnelly, who was arrested on a criminal complaint March 11, 2009, today waived his right to indictment and instead entered a guilty plea to a four-count information. The defendant pled guilty to one count of wire fraud, one count of securities fraud, one count of fraud in connection with futures contracts, and one count of impeding the administration of the internal revenue laws.

“John Donnelly looked his friends, neighbors, co-workers and strangers in the eye and lied to them. He lied to them and then he took their money, in some instances their life savings. He did this knowing that in all liklihood they would never see that money again. And he did it all in the name of greed, to line his own pockets and live a lavish lifestyle,” United States Attorney Julia C. Dudley said today. “However, like all Ponzi schemes, the house of cards, built on lies, can only stand for so long. When the money ran out and investors started asking questions, Mr. Donnelly was exposed for what he is, a fraud.”

According to information entered into the record today in U.S. District Court by Assistant United States Attorney Ronald Huber, Donnelly, through numerous corporations and partnerships that he had established, devised a scheme to defraud and obtain money from investors through false pretenses.

Specifically, Donnelly devised and marketed a complex securities and futures market trading strategy and told investors he would be investing their money using this strategy. However, the money received by Donnelly was almost never traded and was actually distributed to other investors.

In order to maintain the scheme, Donnelly sent monthly statement to investors showing fictitious returns. The defendant also sent annual 1099-INT, 1099-MISC and K-1 tax forms to investors. These forms caused many investors to pay income taxes on their fictitious investment returns.

More than 30 investors entrusted more than $5 million to Donnelly between 1998 and 2009. At the time of his March 11, 2009 arrest, the defendant was in the process of rasing additional funds from new investors based on fictitious returns previously reported to defrauded investors.
The maximum penalty faced by the defendant is 48 years incarceration and/or a fine of up to $5,755,000.

The investigation of the case was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Department of Justice Tax Division, the Internal Revenue Service, the Security Exchange Commission and the Commodities Future Trading Commission. Assistant United States Attorneys Stephen Pfleger and Ronald Huber are prosecuting the case for the United States, they are being assisted by Department of Justice Tax Division Trial Attorney Gregory Bockin.

Second Conspirator Pleads Guilty in $70 Million “Dream Home” Mortgage Fraud Scheme

5/12/2009 U.S. Department of Justice Press Release via the FBI website:

GREENBELT, MD—Charlotte Melissa Josephine Hardmon, age 39, of Bowie, Maryland, pleaded guilty today to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with her participation in a massive mortgage fraud scheme which promised to pay off homeowners’ mortgages on their “Dream Homes,” but left them to fend for themselves, announced United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein.

“Our investigation is continuing,” said U.S. Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein. “We aim to hold all perpetrators accountable and recover any remaining proceeds of the scheme.”

According to her plea agreement, beginning in 2005, co-conspirators targeted homeowners and home purchasers to participate in a purported mortgage payment program called the “Dream Homes Program.” In exchange for a minimum of $50,000 initial investment and an “administrative fee” of up to $5,000, the conspirators promised to make the homeowners’ future monthly mortgage payments, and pay off the homeowners’ mortgage within five to seven years. Dream Homes Program representatives explained to investors that the homeowners’ initial investments would be used to fund investments in automated teller machines (ATMs), flat screen televisions that would show paid business advertisements and electronic kiosks that sold goods and services. To give investors the impression that the Dream Homes Program was very successful, Metro Dream Homes spent hundreds of thousands of dollars making presentations at luxury hotels such as the Washington Plaza Hotel in Washington, D.C., the Marriott Marquis Hotel in New York, New York and the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.

In February 2006, the Dream Homes Program added a second program called “POS Dream Homes” that offered similar promises of paying off investor mortgages in five to seven years in exchange for an upfront investment of $50,000 or more. Collectively, these programs had offices in Maryland, the District of Columbia, Virginia, North Carolina, New York, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, and California. The Dream Homes Program successfully recruited over 1,000 investors who invested over $70 million.

Hardmon was hired in December 2006 at an annual salary of $200,000 as a business consultant for digital advertising for Metro POS. Her salary was two and one-half times her prior salary as a marketing executive in Boston, Massachusetts. Hardmon received a Christmas bonus of $16,000 just two weeks after she began work.

Shortly after starting work, Hardmon saw that Metro POS had little organization. Personnel decisions as to hiring and salary were often made without consulting division heads such as Hardmon. Hardmon’s sales staff was being paid on salary, despite the fact that the sales staff had generated no material revenue.  Hardmon imposed a commission structure and laid off most of the staff in her division in an attempt to improve the disorganization.

Hardmon bought a home for $899,000 in June 2007 and enrolled her home in the Dream Homes Program.

At no time throughout her employment did Hardmon see any evidence of material revenue being generated from the digital advertising. She saw no evidence of any revenue being generated by any division of the company.

Hardmon attended a meeting of Metro Dream Homes senior executives in June 2007 in which they were told that the company was accumulating much more debt than revenue, and that the companies which Metro Dream Homes had been in “partnership” with also were generating no revenue.

After a cease and desist order was issued by a Maryland court against Metro Dream Homes, Hardmon participated in meetings in which investors were told that the company’s legal difficulties were the result of either misunderstandings or racial animus against company leaders. Hardmon knew the purpose of the meetings was to calm investor fears. She participated in these meetings, despite her knowledge that the company was generating no revenue. In a meeting on September 8, 2007, Hardmon stated that the digital advertising side of the company was viable. In addition, she stood by and gave audible support while senior Metro Dream Homes employees stated that the company was doing well.

From December 2006 to October 2007 while Hardmon was employed by Metro POS, she received approximately $167,000 in salary and one mortgage payment.

Hardmon faces a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a fine of $1 million or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater. U.S. District Judge Roger W. Titus scheduled sentencing for September 24, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. As part of her plea agreement, Hardmon has agreed to pay restitution for the full amount of the victims’ losses.

Carole Nelson, age 50, of Washington, D.C., pleaded guilty to money laundering on April 28, 2009 in connection with this scheme. Judge Titus scheduled her sentencing for August 6, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. As part of her plea agreement, Nelson has agreed to forfeit two homes in Virginia and Washington, D.C.

This prosecution is being brought jointly by the Maryland and Washington, D.C. Mortgage Fraud Task Forces, which are comprised of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia. The Task Forces were formed to promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution of various kinds of mortgage fraud schemes. This case, as well as other cases brought by members of the Task Forces, demonstrates the commitment of law enforcement agencies to protect consumers from fraud and help to ensure the integrity of the mortgage market and other credit markets. Information about mortgage fraud prosecutions is available on the internet at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/md/Mortgage-Fraud/index.html.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein praised the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation, the Maryland Attorney General’s Office – Securities Division and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – Office of Inspector General for their investigative work.  Mr. Rosenstein thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys for the District of Maryland Jonathan C. Su and Bryan E. Foreman, who are prosecuting the case.