BUSINESS OWNER CONVICTED IN $126 MILLION SCHEME TO DEFRAUD

3/19/2009 U.S. Department of Justice News Release via the FBI Website:

BUSINESS OWNER CONVICTED IN $126 MILLION SCHEME TO DEFRAUD CLIENTS OF FUNDS ALLEGEDLY HELD IN TRUST

WASHINGTON—A federal jury in Richmond, Va., today convicted the former owner of The 1031 Tax Group LLP, (1031TG) of charges stemming from his scheme to defraud and obtain approximately $126 million in client funds held by 1031TG, Acting Assistant Attorney General Rita M. Glavin of the Criminal Division and Acting U.S. Attorney Dana J. Boente of the Eastern District of Virginia announced.

After a three-week trial in federal court in Richmond, a jury found Edward H. Okun, of Miami, guilty of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, money laundering, bulk cash smuggling and perjury.

According to the evidence presented at trial, from August 2005 through April 2007, Okun and others used 1031TG and its subsidiaries, all owned by Okun, in a scheme to defraud clients of millions of dollars through false pretenses.  Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code allows investment property owners to defer the capital gains tax that would otherwise be due on properties sold, if the proceeds are used to purchase new property in a specified time frame.  To facilitate this exchange, investment property owners deposit the proceeds of property sales with qualified intermediaries and sign exchange agreements that include various promises by the qualified intermediaries to clients regarding the safekeeping and use of exchange funds.

Specifically, the evidence presented at trial established that 1031TG obtained funds by promising clients that their money would be used solely to effect 1031 exchanges as outlined in the exchange agreements.  After making such promises, evidence showed that Okun and others misappropriated approximately $126 million in client funds, to support his lavish lifestyle, pay operating expenses for his various companies, invest in commercial real estate, and purchase additional qualified intermediary companies to obtain access to additional client funds.  In the negotiations to purchase additional qualified intermediary companies, evidence showed that Okun and others misled owners of those companies to induce them to sell their companies to Okun, who then took control of and misappropriated the client funds.

The evidence also showed that Okun instructed his employees in Richmond to withdraw $15,000 in cash from Investment Properties of America’s (IPofA) bank account, a company owned by Okun, and smuggle the cash to his personal yacht on Paradise Island in the Bahamas to avoid federal currency reporting requirements.

The jury also found that Okun made material false statements under oath before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in a fraudulent attempt to assert a personal attorney-client relationship with a former chief legal officer of IPofA.

Okun will remain in custody awaiting sentencing.  In addition to restitution and fines, Okun faces a maximum prison term of 20 years on each count of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and certain counts of money laundering; 10 years on certain money laundering counts; five years on the charge of bulk cash smuggling; and five years on the charge of perjury.

In related cases, Lara Coleman, the former chief operating officer of IPofA, pleaded guilty on Jan. 6, 2009, to conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud and to making a material false statement to federal investigators and agreed, under the terms of the plea, to a sentence of 10 years in prison. Robert D. Field II and Richard E. Simring have also pleaded guilty to participating in the conspiracy to defraud 1031TG customers.  Field was the chief financial officer and Simring was the chief legal officer of a holding company that was set up, in part, to oversee both IPofA and 1031TG, though neither company was ever officially made a subsidiary of the holding company.  Field pleaded guilty on July 3, 2008, and Simring pleaded guilty on July 24, 2008.  Field and Simring each face a maximum of five years in prison at sentencing. Coleman, Field and Simring are scheduled to be sentenced on May 1, 2009.  All three defendants who pleaded guilty in this case agreed to forfeiture.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael S. Dry and Jessica A. Brumberg for the Eastern District of Virginia and Trial Attorney Brigham Q. Cannon of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.  This continuing investigation is being conducted by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Internal Revenue Service and the FBI.

# # #

FORMER CEO OF KB HOME CHARGED WITH SECURITIES FRAUD IN CONNECTION WITH STOCK-OPTION BACKDATING SCHEME

3/6/2009 Department of Justice Press Release via the FBI Website:

LOS ANGELES – A former CEO and chairman of the board of KB Home was named today in a 20-count indictment that charges him in a scheme to defraud KB and its shareholders by awarding himself and other KB executives millions of dollars in undisclosed stock-based compensation in connection with the backdating of stock options over a seven-year period.

Bruce E. Karatz, 63, of Bel Air Estates, was charged with seven counts of mail fraud, five counts of wire, three counts of securities fraud, four counts of making false statements in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and one count of lying to KB’s accountants.

This scheme alleged in the indictment involves Karatz’s use of hindsight pricing to inflate the value of stock options granted to him and other KB executives, as well as Karatz’s ongoing concealment of this practice from KB’s board of directors, Compensation Committee and shareholders. Furthermore, the indictment alleges, when an internal investigation into stock-option backdating was initiated at KB in May 2006, Karatz falsely denied his orchestration of the stock-option backdating scheme and caused a false report of KB’s historical option-granting practices to be submitted to KB’s Audit Committee and outside auditor, which impeded the timely and accurate disclosure of this matter in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a related case, a former senior vice president of KB and head of Human Resources, Gary A. Ray, pleaded guilty on February 6 to conspiring with Karatz to obstruct justice. By pleading guilty, Ray admitted that he and Karatz collaborated in causing a false and misleading report on KB’s historical option-granting practices to be submitted to KB’s Audit Committee and other KB managers for the purpose of warding off a contemplated SEC probe into backdating at KB (see: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/cac/pressroom/pr2008/154.html).

According to the indictment returned this afternoon by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles, Karatz engaged in a fraudulent scheme to disguise and conceal from KB and its shareholders the nature and value of stock-based compensation KB was actually awarding to Karatz and other KB executives through its stock-option granting practices. Karatz allegedly caused below-market exercise prices to be selected for stock options granted to him and other KB executives by using hindsight to backdate the grant date of these options to the date with the lowest price point for KB’s stock.

In furtherance of the scheme, the indictment alleges, Karatz concealed his use of hindsight pricing from KB’s board of directors, Compensation Committee and shareholders. In various public filings made by KB, Karatz made it appear that KB’s option grants were made “as of” the date that had been selected. Karatz allegedly caused false statements to issued that claimed that all employee stock options granted under KB’s compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the fair market value of KB’s stock on the date of the grant. This representation created the false impression that KB was granting at-the-money stock options to KB executives, for which the recording of a compensation expense was not required, when in fact KB was granting discounted, in-the-money stock options, a large portion of which were awarded to Karatz himself.

As a result of these fraudulent practices, Karatz caused KB to grant millions of backdated, in-the-money options to himself and to other KB executives without publicly reporting the compensation and without taking the required compensation expense on KB’s financial statements. As a result, the indictment alleges, Karatz was able to misappropriate millions of dollars in KB’s funds when he exercised his options, while maintaining the pretense that these gains were solely the result of the appreciation of the market value of KB’s stock.

After KB commenced an internal investigation into its option-granting practice in May 2006, Karatz continued to conceal that he had backdated KB’s stock option grants during the preceding seven years. Among other things, Karatz caused a false and misleading internal report to be presented to KB’s Audit Committee and outside auditors that represented there was “no evidence of the backdating of options or other manipulation by management.” KB’s Audit Committee and other members of KB’s management relied on this false and misleading internal report in deciding to file KB’s Form-10Q for the three month period ending May 31, 2006, without disclosing any irregularities in KB’s past option-granting practices.

After KB discovered irregularities in its reporting, KB was unable to timely file its third quarter 10Q in October 2006. When KB ultimately filed its 2006 3rd quarter Form-10Q and its 2006 Form-10K in February 2007, the company was forced to recognize, for the first time, more than $36 million in additional stock-based compensation expenses and a total increase of more than $70 million in accrued liabilities arising from adjustments required to address the backdated stock options.

Karatz is expected to make his initial court appearance on March 26 in federal court in Los Angeles. If convicted of all the charges, Karatz faces a statutory maximum sentence of 415 years in federal prison.

An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

“Top executives of publicly traded companies have a duty to adhere to all the rules imposed on them by company directors and members of the public who invest their hard-earned money,” said United States Attorney Thomas P. O’Brien. “Mr. Karatz allegedly broke the rules, and then lied about it, to line his pockets and then to conceal his windfall from his company and the trading public. Efforts to manipulate a company’s compensation process, and then to impede the oversight function of the SEC, seriously compromise the integrity of our entire system.”

“This investigation painted a picture of avarice and dishonesty at its core,” said Salvador Hernandez, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI in Los Angeles.  “The FBI is committed to devoting resources to the continuing crisis involving corporate figures who abdicate their responsibility in order to enrich themselves.”

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

STANFORD FINANCIAL GROUP CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER CHARGED WITH OBSTRUCTION

2/26/2009 United States Department of Justice News Release via the F.B.I. Website:

WASHINGTON – Laura Pendergest-Holt, the chief investment officer of Houston-based Stanford Financial Group (SFG), was arrested today by agents of the FBI’s Houston Field Office on a criminal complaint charging her with obstruction of a proceeding before an agency of the United States, announced Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division Rita M. Glavin and Special Agent in Charge of the Houston Division of the FBI, Andrew R. Bland, III.

Pendergest-Holt will make her initial appearance on Friday, Feb. 27, 2009, before U.S. Magistrate Mary Milloy at the federal courthouse in Houston.

According to the complaint, Pendergest-Holt met on Feb. 10, 2009 with representatives of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at the SEC’s Fort Worth, Texas, regional office based on an SEC subpoena. According to the complaint, the SEC summoned Pendergest-Holt to testify in its investigation into allegations that SFG and related companies, including the Stanford International Bank (SIB), had defrauded investors and account holders of an estimated $8 billion in deposits.

The complaint alleges Pendergest-Holt made several affirmative misrepresentations to the SEC in order to obstruct its investigation.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that Pendergest-Holt met with several SFG corporate officers in Miami during the week of Feb. 2, 2009, to prepare for her upcoming testimony before SEC staff scheduled a week later. Pendergast-Holt is alleged to have discussed with those corporate officers the SIB’s “Tier III” Portfolio, using a computer-generated pie chart she created. The complaint alleges that the pie chart reflected, among other things, a $1.6 billion loan to a shareholder from the Tier III Portfolio.

The complaint alleges that the following week, on Feb. 10, Pendergest-Holt, accompanied by an attorney, made several misrepresentations under oath to SEC investigators during her testimony, including her alleged failure to reveal that she had participated in the Miami preparation session with SFG corporate officers. Pendergest-Holt also allegedly misrepresented her own preparatory work for the testimony, saying she had met with no one other than the attorney as she worked to ready herself for the session with the SEC.

The complaint alleges further that Pendergest-Holt failed to reveal to the SEC investigators during the testimony session that she was a member of the SIB’s investment committee, or the extent of her knowledge of the bank’s Tier III Portfolio. The complaint also alleges that at no point did Pendergest-Holt reveal that the $1.6 billion loan had been discussed with corporate officers in Miami. When asked by investigators if she served on the SIB limited investment committee, Pendergest-Holt is alleged to have answered “no.”

Pendergest-Holt was interviewed again by SEC investigators on Feb. 17, 2009, in Memphis, Tenn., and, according to the complaint, she continued to obstruct the SEC’s investigation by saying she had no knowledge of the Tier III Portfolio.

The complaint is merely an accusation based on a finding of probable cause by a magistrate judge, and the defendant has not been indicted by a grand jury. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Houston Field Office, Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigations and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Matthew Klecka and Attorney Allan Medina of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.