<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WorkAtHomeTruth.com Blog &#187; F-+ Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/category/not-recommended/f-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog</link>
	<description>Questions &#038; Answers about work at home jobs &#038; businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<copyright>admin</copyright>
		<itunes:author>admin</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>Just another WordPress weblog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		
		<item>
		<title>QuickIncomeBluePrint review</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/07/14/quickincomeblueprint-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/07/14/quickincomeblueprint-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[F-+ Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Does QuickIncomeBluePrint really work?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is QuickIncomeBluePrint a scam?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is QuickIncomeBluePrint legit?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Walker QuickIncomeBluePrint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Walker's QuickIncomeBluePrint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Income BluePrint review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickIncome BluePrint review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickIncomeBluePrint.com review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickIncomeBluePrint?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickIncomeBluePrintReview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www QuickIncomeBluePrint com opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.Quick Income BluePrint.com opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.QuickIncomeBluePrint.com review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwwQuickIncomeBluePrintcom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=2520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently got the following question about QuickIncomeBluePrint and my quick review of the QuickIncomeBluePrint salesletter turned up some very odd things&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Hello.</p>
<p>I am wondering about two specific online businesses. I checked the A-Z list and they are not listed. But I am still wondering if they are legitimate opportunities. The first is Quick Income Blueprint</p>
<p><a href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/07/14/quickincomeblueprint-review/" class="more-link">Read more on QuickIncomeBluePrint review&#8230;</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got the following question about QuickIncomeBluePrint and my quick review of the QuickIncomeBluePrint salesletter turned up some very odd things&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Hello.</p>
<p>I am wondering about two specific online businesses. I checked the A-Z list and they are not listed. But I am still wondering if they are legitimate opportunities. The first is Quick Income Blueprint</p>
<p>I found many good online reviews for Quick Income Blueprint but I would value more some feedback from someone here. I have gotten a lot of useful information from workathometruth so I have confidence in this site.</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> I&#039;ve answered your post about Paul Walker&#039;s <span class="il">QuickIncomeBluePrint</span> in the forum here:</p>
<p><a title="QuickIncomeBluePrint photo sources" href="http://www.workathometruth.com/forum/f33/quick-income-blueprint-118/"><strong>QuickIncomeBlueprint photo sources revealed in the WorkAtHomeTruth forum</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Quick video covering the testimonials:</strong><br />
<object width="560" height="340" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY1fqRc8nMI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY1fqRc8nMI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>This guy is bold. The testimonials and vacation home appear to be faked, but what&#039;s more hilarious is who the people actually are and what the &#034;vacation home&#034; actually is.</p>
<p>What&#039;s amazing to me is the fact that so many people are promoting this product&#8230;now, of course the actual QuickIncomeBluePrint product may be perfectly fine &#8211; but if so, why would the copywriter for QuickIncomeBlueprint have to resort to such weird testimonials.</p>
<p>Just a quick glance through Google returns an astonishing number of affiliates promoting the Quick Income Blueprint product &#8211; some doing reviews of QuickIncomeBlueprint, some giving their opinion, and some just jamming their sites with articles.</p>
<ul>
<li>QuickIncomeBluePrintTest.com makes the bold claim that &#034;Quick Income Blueprint is developed to address that key issue. It contains raw meat of precise techniques to follow to make that first $10, $50, $100, $1000, etc. That’s its biggest advantage over other programs you’ll see out there.&#034;</li>
<li>QuickIncomeBluePrints.com poses the question &#034;Is Quick Income BluePrint a scam?&#034; and assures the reader that &#034;The simple answer is No, <strong>Quick Income Blueprint</strong> is not a scam. QIB is a series of proven methods that are making money for others just like you &#8211; right now.&#034;</li>
<li>QuickIncomeBlueprint.net claims that &#034;Our test grandmother made enough money to hire the Chippendale dancers for her 61st birthday. &#034; &#8211; allegedly using methods from Quick Income Blueprint.</li>
<li>QuickIncomeBlueprintReviewed.com makes the bizarre hyperlink mistake when it says, &#034;You can buy the QuickIncomeBluePrint by clicking here&#034; but doesn&#039;t have the hyperlink on &#034;clicking here&#034;, but instead places it only on QuickIncomeBluePrint.</li>
<li>QuickIncomeBluePrint-review.com makes the hilarious statement that &#034;Kate and Albert above are just a few of the successful users of the Quick Income Blueprint system. Just like you, they are also in search of effective online money making system and never stopped searching until they found the easy to follow steps step stated in Paul Walker’s system.&#034; (Watch the video in this blog post to see what that statement is so funny).</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, this whole QuickIncomeBlueprint sales page and review phenomenon is so bizarre I think it needs special accolades&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#039;d say that QuickIncomeBluePrint actually qualifies for an F-+ award!</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2009/07/14/quickincomeblueprint-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SiteReviewAuthority gets special F-+ award!</title>
		<link>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/08/24/sitereviewauthority-gets-f/</link>
		<comments>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/08/24/sitereviewauthority-gets-f/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul (Founder, WorkAtHomeTruth)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[F-+ Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Stera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrewstera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Richard Andrew Stera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike stera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mikestera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site review authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitereviewauthority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitereviewauthority org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitereviewauthority.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www sitereviewauthority org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.sitereviewauthority.og]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WorkAtHomeTruth is proud to announce the first recipient of the newly created <strong>&#034;F-+&#034;</strong> award &#8211; SiteReviewAuthority &#8211; a review site that in our opinion is so bad no single letter of the alphabet could convey the appropriate distinction merited by the aggressively poor choices for making money at home and then boldly gives them the completely meaningless &#034;SRA Seal of Approval&#034;, which after considerable research (15 seconds of blinking our eyes really fast and hitting ourselves in the head with a toy hammer) we&#039;ve discovered to have the authoritative equivalent of a discarded wet noodle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/08/24/sitereviewauthority-gets-f/" class="more-link">Read more on SiteReviewAuthority gets special F-+ award!&#8230;</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WorkAtHomeTruth is proud to announce the first recipient of the newly created <strong>&#034;F-+&#034;</strong> award &#8211; SiteReviewAuthority &#8211; a review site that in our opinion is so bad no single letter of the alphabet could convey the appropriate distinction merited by the aggressively poor choices for making money at home and then boldly gives them the completely meaningless &#034;SRA Seal of Approval&#034;, which after considerable research (15 seconds of blinking our eyes really fast and hitting ourselves in the head with a toy hammer) we&#039;ve discovered to have the authoritative equivalent of a discarded wet noodle.</p>
<p><strong>Background of the </strong><strong>&#034;F-+&#034; awards&#039; most distinguished honoree -Dr. Richard Andrew Stera , Chairman, SiteReviewAuthority.org</strong></p>
<p>The F-+ award apparently isn&#039;t the first &#034;first&#034; for Dr. Richard Andrew Stera. Apparently the good doc received his Phd from a university located in &#034;opposite world&#034; where good is bad, bad is good, Fs are As, and As are Fs&#8230;well, you get the idea about the &#034;good&#034; doc.</p>
<p>In other words, if you are to get the most value of of SiteReviewAuthority.org you must view it through the eyes of a man steeped in the critical research methods of an &#034;opposite-world&#034; type university.</p>
<p>Another little known fact about the &#034;good&#034; doc is that his title of Chairman is often completely misunderstood &#8211; even the briefest research into his background reveals this quickly.</p>
<p><strong>The truth about &#034;Chairman&#034;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="349" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLHyuMqJd30&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca&amp;border=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLHyuMqJd30&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca&amp;border=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>It turns out that Dr. Richard Andrew Stera isn&#039;t &#034;Chairman&#034; in the corporate sense, but more in the super-hero (remember&#8230;&#034;opposite world&#034; terminology) sense.</p>
<p>While it&#039;s possibly true that Dr. Richard Andrew Stera was bitten by a radioactive spider &#8211; legend has it that the bite had no prolonged effect. However, the bite did cause him to trip over an office chair which ultimately got embedded into his left knee.</p>
<p>Surgical removal of the chair being impractical, a special &#034;melting procedure&#034; was used to melt away the chair, which inexplicably got absorbed into Dr. Stera&#039;s blood stream and ultimately led to the manifestation of &#034;ChairMan&#034; &#8211; a superhero with the special powers of a chair!<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.workathometruth.com"><br />
If you want to get serious about working from home, visit www.WorkAtHomeTruth.com</a></strong></p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.workathometruth.com/blog/2008/08/24/sitereviewauthority-gets-f/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
