DataEntryDesk question answered

I just finished answering a question about a site called DataEntryDesk in the WorkAtHomeTruth forum.

If you want to get to the details, click here to see the answer to the DataEntryDesk.com question.

I’m always surprised to get nearly the same question so often and pretty much give the same or similar answer almost every time. It’s almost as if people think that just by having an internet connection the laws of the real world change.

They don’t. You still have to work, you still have to take risks, you still have to cut your losses, learn from them, and roll out and leverage your successes.

There certainly are opportunities online that don’t exist offline, but not basic foundational ones.

By the way, my answer to the DataEntryDesk question should also help you if you’re wondering about any of the following:

  • DataEntryCapital
  • EJogsGuru
  • PtJob4U
  • Online-DataEntry

Click here to see the answer to the DataEntryDesk.com question.

Regulatory Reform Over-The-Counter (OTC) Derivatives

5/13/2009 United States Treasury Deaprtment Press Release:

The crisis of the past 20 months has exposed critical gaps and weaknesses in our financial regulatory system. As risks built up, internal risk management systems, rating agencies and regulators simply did not understand or address critical behaviors until they had already resulted in catastrophic losses. Those failures have caused a dramatic loss of confidence in our financial institutions and have contributed to a severe recession.

Last March, Secretary Geithner laid out new regulatory rules of the road to ensure we never face a crisis of this magnitude again. An essential element of reform is the establishment of a comprehensive regulatory framework for over-the-counter derivatives, which under current law are largely excluded or exempted from regulation.

As the AIG situation has made clear, massive risks in derivatives markets have gone undetected by both regulators and market participants. But even if those risks had been better known, regulators lacked the proper authorities to mount an effective policy response.

Today, to address these concerns, the Obama Administration proposes a comprehensive regulatory framework for all Over-The-Counter derivatives.

Moving forward, the Administration will work with Congress to implement this framework and bring greater transparency and needed regulation to these markets. The Administration will also continue working with foreign authorities to promote the implementation of similar measures around the world to ensure our objectives are not undermined by weaker standards abroad.

Objectives of Regulatory Reform of OTC Derivatives Markets

  • Preventing Activities Within The OTC Markets From Posing Risk To The Financial System Regulators must have the following authority to ensure that participants do not engage in practices that put the financial system at risk:
  • The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the securities laws should be amended to require clearing of all standardized OTC derivatives through regulated central counterparties (CCP):
    • CCPs must impose robust margin requirements and other necessary risk controls and ensure that customized OTC derivatives are not used solely as a means to avoid using a CCP.
    • For example, if an OTC derivative is accepted for clearing by one or more fully regulated CCPs, it should create a presumption that it is a standardized contract and thus required to be cleared.
  • All OTC derivatives dealers and all other firms  who create large exposures to counterparties should be subject to a robust regime of prudential supervision and regulation, which will include:
      • Conservative capital requirements
      • Business conduct standards
      • Reporting requirements
      • Initial margin requirements with respect to bilateral credit exposures on both standardized and customized contracts
  • Promoting Efficiency And Transparency Within The OTC Markets — To ensure regulators would have comprehensive and timely information about the positions of each and every participant in all OTC derivatives markets, this new framework includes:
  • Amending the CEA and securities laws to authorize the CFTC and the SEC to impose:
      • Recordkeeping and reporting requirements (including audit trails).
      • Requirements for all trades not cleared by CCPs to be reported to a regulated trade repository.
        • CCPs and trade repositories must make aggregate data on open positions and trading volumes available to the public.
        • CCPs and trade repositories must make data on individual counterparty’s trades and positions available to federal regulators.
      • The movement of standardized trades onto regulated exchanges and regulated transparent electronic trade execution systems.
      • The development of a system for the timely reporting of trades and prompt dissemination of prices and other trade information.
      • The encouragement of regulated institutions to make greater use of regulated exchange-traded derivatives.
  • Preventing Market Manipulation, Fraud, And Other Market Abuses The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and securities laws should be amended to ensure that the CFTC and the SEC have:
    • Clear and unimpeded authority for market regulators to police fraud, market manipulation, and other market abuses.
    • Authority to set position limits on OTC derivatives that perform or affect a significant price discovery function with respect to futures markets.
    • A complete picture of market information from CCPs, trade repositories, and market participants to provide to market regulators.
  • Ensuring That OTC Derivatives Are Not Marketed Inappropriately To Unsophisticated Parties Current law seeks to protect unsophisticated parties from entering into inappropriate derivatives transactions by limiting the types of counterparties that could participate in those markets.  But the limits are not sufficiently stringent.
  • The CFTC and SEC are reviewing the participation limits in current law to recommend how the CEA and the securities laws should be amended to tighten the limits or to impose additional disclosure requirements or standards of care with respect to the marketing of derivatives to less sophisticated counterparties such as small municipalities.

###

REPORTS

WORK-AT-HOME SCAMS Job One: Don’t Take the Bait

FBI 4/17/2009 Headline:

Everyone’s seen them—seductive work-at-home opportunities hyped in flyers tacked to telephone poles, in newspaper classifieds, in your e-mail, and all over the web, promising you hundreds or thousands of dollars a week for typing, stuffing envelopes, processing medical billing, etc. And it’s just a phone call or mouse click away…

share.gif

Might be tempting during these uncertain economic times, but beware of any offers that promise easy money for minimum effort—many are scams that fill the coffers of criminals.

Here are a few of the most common work-at-home scams.

  • Advance-fee: Starting a home-based business is easy! Just invest a few hundred dollars in inventory, set-up, and training materials, they say. Of course, if and when the materials do come, they are totally worthless…and you’re stuck with the bill.
  • Counterfeit check-facilitated “mystery shopper:” You’re sent a hefty check and asked to deposit it into your bank account, then withdraw funds to shop and check out the service of local stores and wire transfer companies. You keep a small amount of the money for your “work,” but then, as instructed, mail or wire the rest to your “employer.” Sound good? One problem: the initial check was phony, and by the time your bank notifies you, your money is long gone and you’re on the hook for the counterfeit check.
  • Pyramid schemes: You’re hired as a “distributor” and shell out big bucks for promotional materials and product inventories with little value (like get-rich quick pamphlets). You’re promised money for recruiting more distributors, so you talk friends and family into participating. The scheme grows exponentially but then falls apart—the only ones who make a profit are the criminals who started it.
  • Unknowing involvement in criminal activity: Criminals—often located overseas—sometimes use unwitting victims to advance their operations, steal and launder money, and maintain anonymity. For example, they may “hire” you as a U.S.-based agent to receive and re-ship checks, merchandise, and solicitations to other potential victims…without you realizing it’s all a ruse that leaves no trail back to the crooks.

Add identity theft to the mix. As if these schemes aren’t bad enough, many also lead to identity theft. During the application process, you’re often asked to provide personal information that can be used to steal from your bank account or establish new credit cards in your name.

On the job. A host of law enforcement and regulatory agencies, including the FBI, investigate these schemes and track down those responsible. But the most effective weapon against these fraudsters is you not falling for the scams in the first place.

A few tips:

  • Contact the Better Business Bureau to determine the legitimacy of the company.
  • Be suspicious when money is required up front for instructions or products.
  • Don’t provide personal information when first interacting with your prospective employer.
  • Do your own research into legitimate work-at-home opportunities, using the “Work-at-Home Sourcebook” and other resources that may be available at your local library.
  • Ask lots of questions of potential employers—legitimate companies will have answers for you!

And if you think you’ve been the victim of a work-at-home scam, file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission’s Consumer Sentinel or our Internet Crime Complaint Center.