MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR PONZI SCHEME OPERATOR CHARGED

This press release is related to this press release: SEC sues Miami resident for conducting multi million dollar ponzi scheme

MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR PONZI SCHEME OPERATOR CHARGED WITH WIRE FRAUD IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUDULENT SALE OF CONSUMER ELECTRONICS

R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Jonathan I. Solomon, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), announced today’s filing of an Information charging defendant Andres Leonel Pimstein, 48, of Miami-Dade County, with wire fraud in connection with the operation of a multi-million dollar “Ponzi” scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.  The case will be heard before United States District Judge Adalberto Jordan.  Pimstein is scheduled to make his initial appearance before a United States Magistrate Judge on November 12, 2008.  If convicted, Pimstein faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years and a $250,000 fine.

According to the Information filed in court, from approximately March 2005 through early 2008, Pimstein solicited individuals to invest in a business venture involving the purported sale of consumer electronics, – namely, the Apple iPod®– to Ripley Corp. S.A., a department store chain based in Chile.  Pimstein told investors that he planned to wholesale-purchase the iPod® and other electronics and sell them to Ripley at above-market rates.  Pimstein promised investors annual returns ranging from 18% to 36% to be paid in monthly installments.

Pimstein solicited investors into numerous corporations created for operating the scheme, including The Bottom Line of South Florida, Inc., and Summit Trading LLC.  During the scheme, Pimstein is alleged to have offered some of the investors the opportunity to earn additional proceeds by recruiting new investors.  In exchange for a commission fee, these investors formed independent corporate entities from which to solicit and receive new investor funds.

To execute the scheme, Pimstein allegedly created false invoices to document the purported purchase and sale of various consumer electronics.  In fact, however, he did not purchase anything for subsequent sale for profit to Ripley or anyone else.  Instead,  Pimstein used the investment capital he received from some investors, intended for product purchases, to pay monthly returns, “interest payments,” and distributions to other investors who sought to withdraw their money.  This is called a “Ponzi” scheme.  Pimstein also used the investment capital her received for how own personal expenses, including residential mortgage payments, automobile note payments, and child support.

As a result of the scheme, Pimstein raised at least $30 million.  At least 85 of the scheme’s investors lost more than a total of $20 million in investment capital

In addition to the criminal charges, the Miami Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a civil complaint in the United States District Court against Pimstein, The Bottom Line of South Florida, Inc., and Summit Trading LLC in connection with the  “Ponzi” scheme described above.  The SEC complaint seeks permanent injunctions, an accounting, disgorgement, and civil penalties.

Mr. Acosta commended the investigative efforts of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as the cooperative efforts of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Miami Regional Office.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey E. Tsai.

SEC Sues Miami Resident for Conducting Multi-Million Dollar Ponzi Scheme

Washington, D.C., Oct. 30, 2008 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Miami resident Andres L. Pimstein and two private companies, The Bottom Line of South Florida, Inc. and Summit Trading LLC, with securities fraud for conducting a $30 million Ponzi scheme.


Additional Materials


The SEC’s complaint alleges that from at least 2005 to April 2008, Pimstein and his agents offered and sold more than $30 million in securities to at least 80 investors in at least five states, purportedly to fund an export business that Pimstein operated through Bottom Line and Summit. The Ponzi scheme collapsed when the interest and principal Bottom Line and Summit were obligated to pay investors substantially exceeded the amount of new funds Pimstein and his agents were able to raise from investors.

“The alleged conduct in this case shows a pattern of outright lies to investors. We remain committed to taking vigorous enforcement action against those who violate the securities laws through fraudulent securities offerings,” said David Nelson, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office.

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court for the Southern District of Florida, Pimstein and his agents told investors that Bottom Line and Summit would use the proceeds from their investments to buy iPods and other personal electronics from vendors in the United States for resale to Ripley Corp., S.A., a Chilean company that operates one of the largest department store chains in South America. The complaint further alleges that Pimstein and his agents claimed Bottom Line and Summit had a competitive edge over other electronics suppliers because Pimstein was the cousin of Ripley’s chief executive officer and had previously worked for Ripley.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that, contrary to these representations, very few electronics were purchased with investor funds and no electronics were re-sold to Ripley. Instead, Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit operated a large Ponzi scheme by using newly invested funds to make principal and interest payments to existing investors. Pimstein and the companies also paid commissions to the agents who solicited investors on the defendants’ behalf. In addition, Pimstein used investor funds to pay his personal expenses.

According to the SEC’s complaint, after the scheme collapsed, Pimstein confessed to local police that that he had operated a Ponzi scheme and admitted that Ripley never purchased any electronics from The Bottom Line or Summit.

The SEC’s complaint charges Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. In its complaint, the SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and financial penalties against Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit, who have all agreed to settle the permanent injunctive portion of the SEC’s enforcement action without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations. In the partial settlements, Pimstein, The Bottom Line, and Summit will pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and financial penalties, the amounts of which will be determined by the court at a later date.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida conducted a parallel investigation of this matter, and simultaneously announced the filing of criminal charges against Pimstein alleging mail and wire fraud. The SEC also acknowledges the assistance of the Miami Beach Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros of Chile (SVS) with its investigation.

The investigation is continuing.

# # #

For more information, contact:

Glenn S. Gordon
Associate Regional Director, SEC’s Miami Regional Office
(305) 982-6360

Chedly C. Dumornay
Assistant Regional Director, SEC’s Miami Regional Office
(305) 982-6377

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-258.htm

FTC Stops Fake ‘Yellow Pages’ Marketers Who Bilked Spanish-Speaking Businesses in Cross-Border Scam

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a U.S. district court judge has frozen the assets of a Canadian operation and ordered a halt to its allegedly unlawful practices – billing businesses in the continental U.S. and Puerto Rico for directory listings they did not order – until the matter is resolved in court. The Commission seeks to permanently prohibit the defendants from future violations and make them give up their ill-gotten gains.

According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants deceptively sell Internet business directory listings and Web page hosting services by phone to Spanish-speaking businesses. The defendants allegedly tell consumers they are calling from the yellow pages or the local telephone company to verify or update business names, addresses, and telephone numbers. The call is frequently referred to as a renewal, and they typically do not mention cost. If asked, they say the cost will be “the same as last year,” although the consumers have never purchased their services.

As stated in the complaint, the defendants’ bills typically arrive in envelopes bearing a symbol often associated with the local telephone company’s yellow pages directory – the familiar two fingers walking across a directory. The bills come from a company called Enterprise Who’s Who and typically charge $359.40 on the initial bill. Many businesses pay the bills believing they are from their local telephone company, or after being told that someone at the business agreed to the service and that the defendants have a tape of the authorization. Consumers who question the charges are threatened with collection and bad credit. Consumers who listen to the defendants’ tape hear no authorization but are still threatened with collection.

When consumers continue to refuse to pay, the defendants allegedly send letters from a purported collection agency, PCM Collections, and threaten adverse credit reports and lawsuits. In many cases, consumers pay the bills to protect their credit.

Consumers who pay often receive additional invoices for other unordered services, variously described as the balance owed for the original service, a renewal fee, or an additional Web hosting service. The defendants continue to tell consumers they have taped authorizations. When consumers ask to cancel additional unauthorized services the company sometimes chargesthem undisclosed cancellation fees ranging from $299 to $500. If these bills are not paid promptly, the defendants pursue collection through re-billing, threatening letters, and dunning telephone calls. If consumers complain to the Better Business Bureau, the defendants agree to stop charging those consumers, but they continue to bill and dun them.

The defendants are 9163-7710 Quebec, Inc., doing business as Enterprise Who’s Who and PCM Collections, and its chief executive officer, Rodolfo Garcia Rodriguez, Jr. They are charged with violating the FTC Act by falsely representing that they have a preexisting business relationship with consumers, that consumers have agreed to purchase their services, and that consumers owe them money.

The FTC appreciates the assistance of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Project COLT, a multi-agency, U.S.-Canada initiative formed in the 1990s to combat telemarketing fraud.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi issued a temporary restraining order on October 9, 2008, and a preliminary injunction on October 17, 2008.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,500 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
James A. Prunty,
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2438

(FTC File No. 0823167)
(Enterprise)